There are visual
diagnostic symptoms that are of extremely valuable tool for the rapid
evaluation of the nutrient status of a plant; they are only some of the tools
available. Other major tools for visual diagnostic symptoms include microscopic
studies, spectral analysis, as well as tissue and soil analysis. These methods,
all have variations in their precision, rapidity and their ability to predict
future nutrient status. Due to the close communication between plant growth and
the environment of the plant, all predictions of future nutrient status must
make assumptions about how the environment will change in time of frame.
In plant, the
principle advantage of visual diagnostic symptoms is that they are readily
obtained and provide an immediate evaluation of the plant nutrient status.
Their main drawback is that the visual symptoms do not develop until after
there has been a major effect on the yield, growth as well as development.
Analysis of plant
tissue is nutrient-specific but it is relatively slow; tissues are to be
sampled, processed, and analyzed before the plant nutrient status can be
predicted. An analysis of the mineral nutrient content of selected plants
tissues, when compared against critical level values, can be used to evaluate
the plant nutrient status at the time of sampling with a relatively high degree
of confidence and can be extrapolated to project nutrient status at harvest.
Soil analysis is similar to tissue analysis but evaluates the potential supplying
power of the soil instead of plant nutrient status. Plant analysis provides
information as to what the plant needs, while that of soil analysis provides
information about the status of the nutrient supply.
No comments:
Post a Comment